A further taste of Iyengar

Finally I got to an Iyengar class! I had attended an introductory course at the Iyengar Institute in London a couple of months back, but given the distance and awkward schedules I haven’t made it back there for a ‘normal’ class. Meantime I was recommended a teacher locally, and although her small class is regularly fully-booked a place became available this week and next. Lucky me! Though it was at Intermediate Level, which I’m obviously not on the basis of an intro course only…

iyengar class setup.JPGSo I went to class this evening. So interesting of course, so different to my usual practice style (vinyasa).

Class started by me being sharply told that sitting cross-legged meant Svastikāsana not Sukhāsana, and on a large block not a brick! Oops. After my experiences of aggressive Iyengar teachers I did momentarily wonder if this was a good place for me to be! But the rest of class went smoothly and verbal corrections were less strict than I experienced in London (the teacher herself made some comment about IYI London being very very precise!). I suspect I flummoxed the teacher by being so proficient at some poses but so clueless and weak at others, but she kept a close eye on me the whole time which was good.

I found it interesting reflecting on the kinds of verbal adjustments I was given — figuring out whether what I ordinarily do in vinyasa class where I’m left more to my own devices shows poor alignment or whether it’s simply a difference in execution between the two traditions. For example in Trikonāsana I was encouraged to grip my shin, something I don’t think I’ve ever heard from my regular teacher; when raising the arms (e.g. in Vīra 1) I was told firmly to bring my hands closer together, even though this felt really sticky in the shoulders, compared to my usual teacher encouraging wider arms to allow the scapulae to relax down the back. But the most flummoxing is the position of the feet in open-hip standing poses. Heel to arch, I was repeatedly told, except on one side where I was told to try heel to toe for reasons that weren’t explained; in my own practice I am usually much wider than this. Hmm, I’ll have to play at home and figure out what I prefer, and why.

Overall I really enjoyed the stimulation of a new style and the different cues or emphasis within familiar poses was fascinating. How much I have to learn! I’m already looking forward to my second class next week. But most of all the experience made me appreciate how fantastic my regular teacher’s cuing is. Even in a brisk vinyasa flow he still finds space for some wonderful explorations of particular āsana, and often varies the anatomical focus which creates so much new awareness. I suspect that in the Iyengar style there is less exploration and more conformity. Well I guess I’ll find out if I continue with these classes. But really – if you’re menstruating you can’t do standing balances?? I wonder why. I’m certainly not used to class beginning with the teacher going round the room asking each person if they were ‘on’ or not!

The only disappointment of class — we didn’t do the formal invocation which I’d been nerdily looking forward to. There was some joke about not doing it in the absence of one of the regular students…. I don’t know. The class felt a little empty, a little mechanistic and I thought invoking Patañjali might have created some other atmosphere… I guess I’m just not used to the complete absence of music (or OM) and the emotional state that can support: a bit of chanting might have helped.

 

6 thoughts on “A further taste of Iyengar

    • Yes I think it is an iyengar thing. I haven’t tried to find out why. There are some v knowledgeable iyengar practitioners and teachers who read regularly, so perhaps one of them might step in on this.

      Like

  1. I’ve been practicing Iyengar yoga for a while, and there are some things we avoid during our periods, but it’s mostly inversions and things that would cause substantial gripping in the abdominal area. The only thing I could think of with the balances is whether there was space at a wall. When we do Vriksasana, we’ll put our bent knee into the wall for more support. In Ardha Candrāsana, we’ll press our back foot into the wall.

    I also think the level of exploration/theming depends on the teacher and how that particular class works (or is capable of/ready for). I’ve definitely had teachers who are more dynamic than others when it comes to diving more deeply into certain asana.

    Glad you’re finding a different style interesting! Yay yoga!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hi Lynne, thanks so much for this thoughtful comment. I’ve been thinking on it and it’s perhaps because the balancing sequence included standing splits, which I guess counts as an inversion. I also noticed open twists only (no closed twists). It’s so different to my usual class! Much to learn about the Iyengar tradition.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s